Great Britain

Party (published cases) · 78 State party: United Kingdom

Published cases (78)

1920
Spain, France, Great Britain v. Portugal
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Elihu Root, A. F. de Savornin Lohman, Charles Edouard Lardy
1918
Case relating to the interpretation of the Runciman-Clémentel agreement of 3 December 1916, Great Britain, France
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Jerome D. Greene
1916
La Masica Case, Great Britain, Honduras
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Alfonso XIII
1911
The Walfish Bay Boundary Case, Germany, Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Joaquin Fernandez Prida
1911
Arrest and Return of Savarkar (France / Great Britain)
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: A. Beernaert, Earl of Desart, Louis Renault, G. Gram
1911
The Savarkar Case, Great Britain, France
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: A. M. F. Beernaert, Earl of Desart, Louis Renault, G. Gram
1910
The North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case (Great Britain / United States of America)
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: H. Lammasch, A. F. de Savornin Lohman, George Gray, Luis M. Drago
1910
The North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case, Great Britain, United States of America
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: H. Lammasch, A. F. de Savornin Lohman, George Gray, Charles Fitzpatrick
1905
Muscat Dhows (France / Great Britain)
Respondent (Government of His Britannic Majesty)

Tribunal: H. Lammasch, Melville W. Fuller, A. F. de Savornin Lohman
1905
The Barotseland Boundary Case, Great Britain, Portugal
Party (Great Britain)

Tribunal: King of Italy Victor-Emmanuel III
1904
The Guiana Boundary Case, Brazil, Great Britain
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Victor Emmanuel
1904
Germany, Great Britain, Italy (other joined Parties: Belgium, Spain, United States, France, Mexico, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway v. Venezuela
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: N. V. Mourawieff, H. Lammasch, F. de Martens
1903
The Alaska Boundary Case, Great Britain, United States of America
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Richard Everard Alverstone, Louis Amable Jette, Allen Bristol Aylesworth, Elihu Root
1902
Sentences arbitrales relatives au différend entre la Grande-Bretagne et la France, rendues par le Baron Lambermont à Bruxelles le 15 juillet 1902
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Baron Lambermont
1899
The Lottie May Incident (Great Britain, Honduras)
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Arthur Beaupré
—
the United States v. Great Britain, respecting the true River Saint Croix, decision of 25 October 1798
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Thomas Barclay, David Howell, Egbert Benson
—
Declaration and decision of the Commissioners of Great Britain and the United States, under Article VI of the Treaty of Ghent of 1814, respecting Boundaries, relating to lakes Ontario, Erie and Huron and River St. Lawrence, decision of 18 June 1822
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Anthony Barclay, Peter B. Porter
—
Report of the Commissioners of Great Britain and the United States appointed to trace the Line of Boundary under Article VII of the Treaty of Ghent of 1814, nearby Sugar Island, decision of 23 October 1826
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Anth: Barclay, Peter B. Porter
—
Sentence arbitrale relative aux requêtes de la Grande-Bretagne et du Portugal sur certains territoires de la côte Est de l’Afrique appartenant autrefois aux Rois de Tembe et Mapoota, incluant les îles de Inyack et Éléphant (Baie de Delagoa ou Lorenzo Marq
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Marie Edme Patrice Maurice de MacMahon
—
Arrangement entre la Grande-Bretagne et la France afin de délimiter leurs zones d’influence respectives dans la région du Niger, décision du 26 juin 1891
Party (Great Britain)
—
Arrangement entre la Grande-Bretagne et la France pour fixer la frontière entre les possessions britanniques et françaises en Côte d’Or, décision du 12 juillet 1893
Party (Great Britain)
—
Great Britain v. Portugal as regards questions relative to the delimitation of their spheres of influence
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Paul-Honoré Vigliani
—
Affaire de l'impôt japonais sur les bâtiments, Allemagne, France, Grande-Bretagne et Japon
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Gregers Gram, Louis Renault, Itchiro Motono
—
Samoan Claims, Germany, Great Britain, United States of America
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: King of Sweden and Norway Oscar II
—
Decision, 14 October 1902
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Oscar II
—
The Venezuelan Preferential Case, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Venezuela et al
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: N. V. Mourawieff, H. Lammasch, F. de Martens
—
Award, 22 February 1904
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: N. V. Mourawieff, H. Lammasch, F. de Martens
—
Mixed Claims Commission Great Britain-Venezuela
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Frank Plumley, Herbert Harrison, Pedro V. Azpurúa, Carlos F. Grisanti
—
De Lemos Case (first reference to umpire)
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Aroa Mines Case
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Motion for interest on awards
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Diplomatic debt Case
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Mathison Case
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Stevenson Case
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Puerto Cabello and Valencia Railway Case
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
the United States v. Great Britain, concluded August 18, 1910
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Great Britain v. U.S. (Yukon Lumber case)
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Great Britain and Others (Gr. Br.)v. U.S. (Canadienne case)
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Owner of the Frederick Gerring, Jr. (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Home Frontier and Foreign Missionary Society of the United Brethren in Christ (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Owners of the Cargo of the Coquitlam (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Owners of the Tattler (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
H.J.Randolph Hemming (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Owners of the Sidra (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (His Britannic Majesty's Government (on behalf of the owners of the Sidra))
—
Owners of the Argonaut and the Colonel Jonas H. French (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
China Navigation Co., Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States (Newchwang case)
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Owners, Officers and Men of the Wanderer (Gr.Br). v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Charterers and Crew of the Kate (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Jesse Lewis (United States) v. Great Britain (David J. Adams case)
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
George Rodney Burt (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Benson Robert Henry (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Heirs of John B. Williams (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Isaac M. Brower (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Eastern Extension, Australasia and China Telegraph Company, Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Robert E. Brown (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Union Bridge Company (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Owner of the R. T. Roy (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Adolph G. Studer (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Owner of the Horace B. Parker (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Owner of the Thomas F. Bayard (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Owner of the Sarah B. Putnam (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Successors of William Webster (United States) v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Cayuga Indians (Great Britain) v. United States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
PART I: British-Mexican Claims Commission
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Benito Flores, Artemus Jones
—
Section I:
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: A. R. Zimmerman, Artemus Jones, John Percival, Benito Flores
—
Mexico City Bombardment Claims (Great Britain) v. United Mexican States
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: John Percival
—
Section II:
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: A. R. Zimmerman, W. H. Stoker, Benito Flores, Fernandez MacGregor
—
The Santa Isabel Claims (Great Britain) v. United Mexican States
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
XXXIX. Claim of Finnish shipowners against Great Britain in respect of the use of certain Finnish vessels during the war. Finland, Great Britain. Stockhol, May 9, 1934.
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Algot Bagge
—
L. S. S. “Lisman”. Disposal of pecuniary claims arising out of the recent war (1914–1918) (USA, Great Britain)
Party (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Jr. Joseph C. Hutcheson
—
X. Aguilar-Amory and Royal Bank of Canada claims. Great Britain versus Costa Rica. Washington, October 18, 1923.
Claimant (Great Britain)

Tribunal: William H. Taft V
—
the United States of America v. Great Britain about the interpretation of the first article of the Treaty of Ghent of 24 December 1814
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Emperor of Russia
—
the United States of America v. Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Case of the Enterprise v. Great Britain, opinions of the Commissioners and decision of the Umpire, Mr. Bates, dated 23 December 1854; case of the Hermosa v. Great Britain, decision of the Umpire, Mr. Bates; and case of the Creole v. Great Britain, decisio
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Case of the Washington v. Great Britain, decision of the Umpire, Mr. Bates, dated 23 December 1854
Respondent (Great Britain)
—
Différend opposant la Grande-Bretagne et le Portugal dans l’affaire Yuille, Shortridge & Cie.
Claimant (Great Britain)
—
Alabama claims of the United States of America against Great Britain
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Charles Francis Adams, Sir Alexander James Edmund Cockburn, Frederick Sclopis, James Stämpfli
—
Sentence arbitrale relative à l’affaire du Sergent Malamine
Respondent (Great Britain)

Tribunal: Baron Lambermont

Compiled with AI from the published awards and decisions in the Forum’s database; it covers public cases only and may contain matching errors. Each entry links to the page it was read from where available. Corrections: info@arbitration.org.