Arbitrators, counsel and experts
Karolína Horáková
Counsel (published cases) · 10
Run a conflict check Full profile
Published cases (10)
-
2025
Antaris Solar GmbH and others v. Czech Repulic
Counsel for the respondent (Weil, Gotshal & Manges s.r.o.) · award p. 9
Tribunal: Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Gary B. Born, Peter Tomka, R. Doak Bishop
-
2019
I.C.W. Europe Investments Limited v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Skils s.r.o. advokátní kancelář (formerly Weil, Gotshal & Manges)) · award p. 14
Tribunal: Hans van Houtte, John Beechey, Toby Landau, Raymond Doak Bishop
-
2019
Photovoltaic Knopf Betriebs GMBH v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Skils s.r.o. advokátní kancelář) · award p. 13
Tribunal: Hans van Houtte, John Beechey, Toby Landau, Raymond Doak Bishop
-
2019
WA Investments Europa Nova Ltd. v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Skils s.r.o. advokátní kancelář) · award p. 14
Tribunal: Hans van Houtte, John Beechey, Toby Landau, Raymond Doak Bishop
-
2019
Voltaic Network GmbH v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Skils s.r.o. advokátní kancelář) · award p. 14
Tribunal: Hans van Houtte, John Beechey, Toby Landau, Raymond Doak Bishop
-
2017
Jürgen Wirtgen, Stefan Wirtgen, Gisela Wirtgen and JSW Solar (zwei) GmbH & Co. KG v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Weil, Gotshal & Manges s.r.o. advokátní kancelář) · award p. 11
Tribunal: Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Gary B. Born, Peter Tomka
-
2017
WNC Factoring Limited v. The Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Weil, Gotshal & Manges s.r.o.) · award p. 6
Tribunal: Gavan Griffith, Robert Volterra, James Crawford
-
2012
Konsortium Oeconomismus v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES s.r.o.) · award p. 2
Tribunal: Eduardo Silva Romero, Sabine Konrad, Andreas Ueltzhoffer, Jiří Marvan
-
2010
Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd. v. The Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Weil, Gotshal & Manges s.r.o.) · award p. 9
Tribunal: David A. R. Williams, Henri C. Alvarez, Christoph Schreuer
-
2009
Invesmart v. Czech Republic
Counsel for the respondent (Weil, Gotshal & Manges) · award p. 6
Tribunal: Michael Pryles, J. Christopher Thomas, Piero Bernardini
Compiled with AI from the published awards and decisions in the Forum’s database; it covers public cases only and may contain matching errors. Each entry links to the page it was read from where available. Corrections: info@arbitration.org.