厦门弘信船务有限公司v. 武钢集团国际经济贸易总公司

Decided by

• IANKINNEllQ.C. Sole arbitrator — appointed by the claimant (Appointed by the claimant; became sole arbitrator when respondent did not appoint an arbitrator within the notice period (London arbitration, 1996 Arbitration Act)) award

For the claimant

北京大成（厦门）律师事务所

For the respondent

上海四维乐马律师事务所

Run a conflict check on these names →

Read with AI from the published documents; each name links to the person’s record. A full case summary follows when it is written.