Skip to main content
Skip to main content

TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v. The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia and another

Tribunal, counsel and experts

Decided by
For the respondent
Norton Rose Australia

Run a conflict check on these names →

Read with AI from the published documents; each name links to the person’s record. A full case summary follows when it is written.

Case ID
High Court of Australia, No. S178/2012
Country
Claimant
TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd
Respondent
The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia and another
Section

Court: Australia, High Court of Australia
Date of decision: 13 March 2013
Case number: S178/2012
New York Convention provisions: II | III | V | V(1) | V(1)(a) | V(1)(c) | V(1)(d) | VII | VII(2)
Source: New York Convention case law case database.