特艾科股份有限公司 (TajcoA/S) v. 严岩 (Jan Szklany)
Tribunal, counsel and experts
- Decided by
- Oluf Engell Tribunal award
- Hanne Schmidt Tribunal award
- Poul Winther Andersen Tribunal award
- For the claimant
- 浙江和义观达律师事务所 · 辽宁东拓律师事务所
- For the respondent
- 北京大成（宁波）律师事务所
Run a conflict check on these names →
Read with AI from the published documents; each name links to the person’s record. A full case summary follows when it is written.
Case ID
辽宁省沈阳市中级人民法院 (Liaoning, Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court), No. (2015) 沈中民四特字第29号
Country
Claimant
特艾科股份有限公司 (TajcoA/S)
Respondent
严岩 (Jan Szklany)
Documents
Section
Court: China, 辽宁省沈阳市中级人民法院 (Liaoning, Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court)
Date of decision: 09 May 2016
Case number: (2015) 沈中民四特字第29号
New York Convention provisions: V | V(2) | V(2)(a)
Source: New York Convention case law case database.