Czech Republic–Netherlands BIT
Agreement on encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments
Bilateral investment treaty 3 cases in the database
Parties: Czech Republic · Netherlands
Treaty text
Status, entry into force and any termination: UNCTAD Investment Policy Hub.
Outcomes
From the published decisions with a clear outcome, as read by the AI summaries.
Cases under this treaty
-
2024
Achmea B.V. v. The Slovak Republic (formerly Eureko B.V. v. The Slovak Republic)
UNCITRAL (ad hoc) · State prevailed
Tribunal: Vaughan Lowe, Albert Jan van den Berg, V.V. Veeder, Peter Tomka, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, J.-C. Bonichot, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, M. Wathelet
-
2021
Fynerdale Holdings BV v. The Czech Republic
PCA · State prevailed
Tribunal: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Wolfgang Kühn, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
-
2003
The Czech Republic v. CME Czech Republic B.V.
UNCITRAL (ad hoc) · claimant prevailed
Tribunal: Wolfgang Kühn, Stephen M. Schwebel, Jaroslav Hándl, Ulla Erlandsson, Per Eklund, Måns Edling
Also named in the summaries as: “Netherlands–Czech Republic BIT”
The text is the public treaty document as gathered from UNCTAD’s compendium or an official source; the cases are the published awards in the database, read by the AI summaries. Corrections: info@arbitration.org.