Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie v. PAO ChZPSN-Profnastil
Tribunal, counsel and experts
- Decided by
- Franz T. Schwarz President award
- Peter Bindner Co-arbitrator award
- Ann-Karin Grill Co-arbitrator award
- For the claimant
- Pavlovich Ya.A. · Rudnitsky V.G.
- For the respondent
- Pomazan I.A. · Zolotova Yu.N. · Shtivelberg F.B.
Run a conflict check on these names →
Read with AI from the published documents; each name links to the person’s record. A full case summary follows when it is written.
Case ID
Верховный Суд Российской Федерации (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation), No. 309-ЭС18-1928
Claimant
Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie
Respondent
PAO ChZPSN-Profnastil
Documents
Judgment of the Верховный Суд Российской Федерации (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation)
2 April 2018
Judgment of the Арбитражный суд Уральского округа (Arbitrazh Court for the Ural District)
4 December 2017
Judgment of the Арбитражный суд Челябинской области (Arbitrazh Court of Chelyabinsk Oblast)
7 September 2017
Judgment of the Commercial Court of Appeal of Casablanca
30 January 2012
Section
Court: Russia, Верховный Суд Российской Федерации (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation)
Date of decision: 02 April 2018
Case number: 309-ЭС18-1928
New York Convention provisions: V
Source: New York Convention case law case database.